Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

State v. Kory J. Malcheski
Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. He also argued, in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5532 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas L. Salzwedel
Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. He contended a warrant was needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5703 - 2017-09-19

State v. David A. Chadwick
evidence obtained as the result of a search warrant based on false information. Chadwick also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10217 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of heroin upon returning from his supplier. His residence was searched pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168972 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
patdown search conducted at the scene. At trial, the officers who conducted the patdown testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139662 - 2015-04-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of this case satisfy any of these justifications for admitting the evidence obtained without a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939082 - 2025-04-10

[PDF] State v. Demarrus D. Willis
to fully present its case. Evidence of gang membership obviously was prejudicial to Willis. Simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 108
2014 WI APP 108 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2014AP391
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121457 - 2014-11-11

[PDF] Connie L. Lentz v. David N. Young
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8402 - 2017-09-19

The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, the de novo standard, is applied where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent that the case is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2226 - 2005-03-31