Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 58507 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion seeking relief for the alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50284 - 2010-05-24
postconviction motion seeking relief for the alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50284 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
received effective assistance from trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State charged Hegna with eleven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
received effective assistance from trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State charged Hegna with eleven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
State v. Anthony Watkins
to Wis. Stat. § 947.01 (2003-04).[2] Watkins contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7642 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 947.01 (2003-04).[2] Watkins contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7642 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry Cook
modification. He contends that the trial court erred when it determined that no new factor existed which could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31
modification. He contends that the trial court erred when it determined that no new factor existed which could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
in restitution to his victims. After Duerst’s probation was revoked in 1996, the trial court sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14958 - 2005-03-31
in restitution to his victims. After Duerst’s probation was revoked in 1996, the trial court sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence or for sentence modification based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107548 - 2017-09-21
motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence or for sentence modification based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107548 - 2017-09-21
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
, that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
, that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derek W. Pfeil
the information mid-trial; (2) whether Pfeil’s counsel ineffectively represented him by failing to introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4951 - 2005-03-31
the information mid-trial; (2) whether Pfeil’s counsel ineffectively represented him by failing to introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4951 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roderick M.
on the grounds that he failed to assume parental responsibility. The guardian claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14771 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that he failed to assume parental responsibility. The guardian claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry Cook
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9132 - 2017-09-19
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9132 - 2017-09-19