Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11111 - 11120 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11111 - 11120 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
State v. Benjamin Mora
. State v. Owen, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996). Although we review the claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2985 - 2005-03-31
. State v. Owen, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996). Although we review the claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2985 - 2005-03-31
Thebco, Inc. v. Lou Ann Collins
was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See Wis. Stat. § 799.207.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2975 - 2005-03-31
was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See Wis. Stat. § 799.207.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2975 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Taylor
. Whether a lineup is impermissibly suggestive is a constitutional question that this court determines de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11546 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a lineup is impermissibly suggestive is a constitutional question that this court determines de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11546 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan A. Buroker
-included offense de novo. State v. Peters, 2002 WI App 243, ¶12, 258 Wis. 2d 148, 653 N.W.2d 300. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31
-included offense de novo. State v. Peters, 2002 WI App 243, ¶12, 258 Wis. 2d 148, 653 N.W.2d 300. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31
09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] Michael A. Woodford appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] Michael A. Woodford appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
State v. Charles Patterson
, which we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9932 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9932 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33343 - 2008-07-09
the trial court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33343 - 2008-07-09
County of Jefferson v. Sean S. Lynch
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446, 448 (1992). However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446, 448 (1992). However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(3). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc., 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143895 - 2015-07-06
. § 802.08(3). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc., 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143895 - 2015-07-06