Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11111 - 11120 of 63721 for records/1000.
Search results 11111 - 11120 of 63721 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
. ¶6 Kroeplin’s argument supporting the trial court’s decision overstates the record. Kroeplin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
. ¶6 Kroeplin’s argument supporting the trial court’s decision overstates the record. Kroeplin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Ruzkowski
thus erroneously considered facts outside the record and sentenced him based upon inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20279 - 2017-09-21
thus erroneously considered facts outside the record and sentenced him based upon inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
actually spent just under $40, bringing him closer to the $50 cap. ¶12 The certiorari record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273698 - 2020-07-30
actually spent just under $40, bringing him closer to the $50 cap. ¶12 The certiorari record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273698 - 2020-07-30
[PDF]
WI APP 11
the Bierbrauers, alleging that it was the “current owner and holder of a certain note and recorded mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89381 - 2014-09-15
the Bierbrauers, alleging that it was the “current owner and holder of a certain note and recorded mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89381 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
whether the Terrace’s refusal to release Mrs. Szymczak’s medical records was ‘knowing and willful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31841 - 2008-02-19
whether the Terrace’s refusal to release Mrs. Szymczak’s medical records was ‘knowing and willful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31841 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
activity, and Ms. Jacobs [sic] had not even bothered to respond to the last two e-mails.” The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100977 - 2017-09-21
activity, and Ms. Jacobs [sic] had not even bothered to respond to the last two e-mails.” The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100977 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203524 - 2017-11-29
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203524 - 2017-11-29
[PDF]
State v. Refugio Nunez
court failed to state on the record the relevant and material factors which influenced the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21697 - 2017-09-21
court failed to state on the record the relevant and material factors which influenced the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21697 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243061 - 2019-06-28
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243061 - 2019-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
is not the equivalent of unfettered decision making, but is to be made based upon the facts appearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
is not the equivalent of unfettered decision making, but is to be made based upon the facts appearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01