Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11141 - 11150 of 72758 for petition.
Search results 11141 - 11150 of 72758 for petition.
[PDF]
Disposition Table for July & August 2013
2013 WI 82 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102232 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI 82 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111588 - 2017-09-21
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111588 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Matthew Frank
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6615 - 2017-09-19
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6615 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
medications as prescribed. On March 16, 2020, the Department petitioned to revoke House’s conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541216 - 2022-07-18
medications as prescribed. On March 16, 2020, the Department petitioned to revoke House’s conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541216 - 2022-07-18
Jeri Bonavia v. Village of Brown Deer
. The petitioners present two issues for our review: (1) “[w]hether an ordinance, proposed by petition to ban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8540 - 2005-03-31
. The petitioners present two issues for our review: (1) “[w]hether an ordinance, proposed by petition to ban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8540 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles Young-Cooper
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3683 - 2017-09-19
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3683 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73605 - 2014-09-15
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeri Bonavia v. Village of Brown Deer
it to the voters as an initiative at the next election. The petitioners then petitioned the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8540 - 2017-09-19
it to the voters as an initiative at the next election. The petitioners then petitioned the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8540 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Pam Wallace
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7232 - 2017-09-20
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7232 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
In Memoriam:
291 1036 Petitions filed on Opns. 166 100 80 136 482 Percentage Filed 54% 40% 42% 47% 47
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35593 - 2014-09-15
291 1036 Petitions filed on Opns. 166 100 80 136 482 Percentage Filed 54% 40% 42% 47% 47
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35593 - 2014-09-15