Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11151 - 11160 of 69145 for did.
Search results 11151 - 11160 of 69145 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The substitute prosecutor did dispute the two-year extended supervision term, stating that he understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080291 - 2026-02-19
The substitute prosecutor did dispute the two-year extended supervision term, stating that he understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080291 - 2026-02-19
State v. Stanley A. Samuel
that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2005-03-31
that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley A. Samuel
statement on grounds that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21
statement on grounds that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21
Mildred R. Cermak v. Michael Swank, M.D.
signed statements from nine of the twelve jurors indicating that the jury did not find negligence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11662 - 2005-03-31
signed statements from nine of the twelve jurors indicating that the jury did not find negligence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel; and Hewitt’s parents testified. Hewitt did not testify. ¶5 The DOC agent testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
counsel; and Hewitt’s parents testified. Hewitt did not testify. ¶5 The DOC agent testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
State v. Sammy Gates
for not rendering an objection when the trial court did not orally read to the jury the party to a crime instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13718 - 2005-03-31
for not rendering an objection when the trial court did not orally read to the jury the party to a crime instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13718 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Daddy Michael did.” ¶5 A police investigator first interviewed Wilcox on April 2, 2004. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
, Daddy Michael did.” ¶5 A police investigator first interviewed Wilcox on April 2, 2004. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
out three topics for comment. ¶5 First, Kern points out that the circuit court did not explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30705 - 2007-10-24
out three topics for comment. ¶5 First, Kern points out that the circuit court did not explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30705 - 2007-10-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
and its order denying his postconviction motion. Because we determine that the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30665 - 2014-09-15
and its order denying his postconviction motion. Because we determine that the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30665 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the template for its ultimate visitation determinations. We further conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149221 - 2017-09-21
as the template for its ultimate visitation determinations. We further conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149221 - 2017-09-21