Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11151 - 11160 of 20373 for sai.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the truth” omitted from the application. Instead, the court perceived, Watson was simply saying he “would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488934 - 2022-03-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion. ¶12 In addition to the officer reporting smelling the odor of alcohol and saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449549 - 2021-11-04

Certification
is not directly relevant to the appeal.[1] It suffices to say that the agreement prohibited Friedlen from
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2014-04-14

State v. Hasan A. Sadikoff
wanted to say to people because he found it hard to find all the right words in English. She indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13910 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to pay for the iPod. MR. BARTA: I’m not going to take an appeal, Your Honor. I’m just saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131840 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 65
. Suffice to say that the dispute involved an allegation that Claudia’s mother was interfering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48817 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Heidi L. Williams
Williams to submit to a preliminary breath test. She refused, saying, “I’m not going to blow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4120 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
Co., 93 Wis. 2d at 272. To say otherwise defies common sense and is contrary to the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ralph J. Smith
11:30. And would not say were I got it.” ¶13 The exclusionary rule requires the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16287 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recognized, “[T]he verb used by [the deputy district attorney] … was ‘recommend.’ He says, ‘I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15