Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11161 - 11170 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 11161 - 11170 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
was not required and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Pursuant to a search warrant, police searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
was not required and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Pursuant to a search warrant, police searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Metz
recognized both that consent could be gleaned from actions as well as words, and that a search following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15259 - 2017-09-21
recognized both that consent could be gleaned from actions as well as words, and that a search following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15259 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert E. Bickham
a no-knock search warrant for suspected narcotics at a suspected drug house. The house was a two-story
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10005 - 2005-03-31
a no-knock search warrant for suspected narcotics at a suspected drug house. The house was a two-story
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Because the dog “indicated on the vehicle for the scent of narcotics,” the truck was searched, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
. Because the dog “indicated on the vehicle for the scent of narcotics,” the truck was searched, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
November 18, 2005,” a day after his cabin was searched. In the current case, Schmaling was accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
November 18, 2005,” a day after his cabin was searched. In the current case, Schmaling was accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
was searched. In the current case, Schmaling was accused of separately possessing firearms between November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53880 - 2014-09-15
was searched. In the current case, Schmaling was accused of separately possessing firearms between November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53880 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
County deputy’s affidavit in support of the search warrant for a blood draw averred that the witness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175543 - 2017-09-21
County deputy’s affidavit in support of the search warrant for a blood draw averred that the witness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175543 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35930 - 2009-03-18
N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35930 - 2009-03-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 163 Ind. App. 35, 321 N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35930 - 2014-09-15
, 163 Ind. App. 35, 321 N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19