Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11171 - 11180 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 11171 - 11180 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
jury trial proceeded after the trial court denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7708 - 2017-09-19
jury trial proceeded after the trial court denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7708 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argued that the trial court erred by allowing testimony which he asserted was inadmissible hearsay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638858 - 2023-04-04
argued that the trial court erred by allowing testimony which he asserted was inadmissible hearsay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638858 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
State v. Dion W. Demmerly
and that the court erroneously allowed the State to introduce the reenactment at trial. Demmerly claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11054 - 2017-09-19
and that the court erroneously allowed the State to introduce the reenactment at trial. Demmerly claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11054 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
R.S. Henderson argues that the trial court erred by not allowing J.C.’s attorney to testify about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123252 - 2017-09-21
R.S. Henderson argues that the trial court erred by not allowing J.C.’s attorney to testify about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123252 - 2017-09-21
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
was frivolous. We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Uselmann breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
was frivolous. We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Uselmann breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for four months. Five weeks before trial, Honeywell identified three witnesses who would rebut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104441 - 2017-09-21
for four months. Five weeks before trial, Honeywell identified three witnesses who would rebut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2019AP1382-CRNM 2 trial. Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520794 - 2022-05-17
are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2019AP1382-CRNM 2 trial. Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520794 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Attorney Peirce filed but withdrew a postconviction motion challenging the effectiveness of Pitts’s trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147257 - 2017-09-21
. Attorney Peirce filed but withdrew a postconviction motion challenging the effectiveness of Pitts’s trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147257 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
weeks before trial, Honeywell identified three witnesses who would rebut Pozorski’s claims. On the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104441 - 2013-11-18
weeks before trial, Honeywell identified three witnesses who would rebut Pozorski’s claims. On the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104441 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
Harrold J. McComas v. Loren Tallmadge
Tallmadge Trust, appeal the trial court’s construction of the Last Will and Testament and Codicil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13099 - 2017-09-21
Tallmadge Trust, appeal the trial court’s construction of the Last Will and Testament and Codicil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13099 - 2017-09-21