Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11181 - 11190 of 68527 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that the mistake was a clerical error completely within Indymac’s control. The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27

COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with second-degree sexual assault (unconscious victim) and third-degree sexual assault (victim did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84313 - 2012-07-02

Susan Marie Melton v. Tedd Allen Melton
placement to the child’s father, Tedd Allen Melton. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6699 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Richard Hurd
to the renewal date. However, Hurd did not receive the required offer to renew because an empty box next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11278 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
at the hearing, but did not. Furthermore, she did not claim that the circuit court’s description of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2010-12-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
exculpatory evidence. Because we conclude that the State did not have a duty to preserve the evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28488 - 2007-03-19

State v. Todd A. Lagerstrom
received effective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that he did, and therefore affirm. Lagerstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12604 - 2005-03-31

County of Green Lake v. Donald L. Peters
. The circuit court found that the evidence established that the software changes did not affect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14946 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the circuit court did not err, and we affirm. The State charged Schiller with sixteen crimes, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564853 - 2022-09-14

[PDF] State v. Thomas Giegler
. The trial court concluded that Giegler’s motion did not sufficiently allege prejudice because any motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2862 - 2017-09-19