Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11181 - 11190 of 46991 for show's.
Search results 11181 - 11190 of 46991 for show's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
must show: (1) deficient representation; and (2) prejudice. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106035 - 2017-09-21
must show: (1) deficient representation; and (2) prejudice. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David J. Fury
notes the issue: Properly considered, the record showed only that, when the deputy asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9958 - 2017-09-19
notes the issue: Properly considered, the record showed only that, when the deputy asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9958 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David J. Fury
notes the issue: Properly considered, the record showed only that, when the deputy asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9959 - 2017-09-19
notes the issue: Properly considered, the record showed only that, when the deputy asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9959 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
258, 273, 558 N.W.2d 379 (1997). To establish prejudice, the defendant “‘must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289558 - 2020-09-23
258, 273, 558 N.W.2d 379 (1997). To establish prejudice, the defendant “‘must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289558 - 2020-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
was, basically, to turn your back on this suffering. So that’s aggravated. Because the evidence at trial showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
was, basically, to turn your back on this suffering. So that’s aggravated. Because the evidence at trial showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
process violation, the defendant must show both that the information was inaccurate and that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
process violation, the defendant must show both that the information was inaccurate and that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael G.
. A preliminary breath test showed his blood alcohol content at .11%. After advising Michael of his Miranda3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2639 - 2017-09-19
. A preliminary breath test showed his blood alcohol content at .11%. After advising Michael of his Miranda3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2639 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Sekaidah, showed up at Wiltrout’s home to see Savanah. Wiltrout indicated Savanah did not live
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143653 - 2017-09-21
, Sekaidah, showed up at Wiltrout’s home to see Savanah. Wiltrout indicated Savanah did not live
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shawano County v. Sarah H.
. § 51.20(13)(e). The petitioner has the burden of overcoming that presumption by showing incompetence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5204 - 2017-09-19
. § 51.20(13)(e). The petitioner has the burden of overcoming that presumption by showing incompetence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5204 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
step, arguing that “there has been no showing of bad faith or intentional non disclosure [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33147 - 2008-06-23
step, arguing that “there has been no showing of bad faith or intentional non disclosure [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33147 - 2008-06-23