Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11191 - 11200 of 50122 for our.
Search results 11191 - 11200 of 50122 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. As to the first issue, our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
sentencing discretion. As to the first issue, our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
CA Blank Order
conviction are not properly before us. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106006 - 2013-12-19
conviction are not properly before us. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106006 - 2013-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion requesting 498 days of sentencing credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
motion requesting 498 days of sentencing credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of discretion” since 1992, when our supreme court replaced the phrase with “erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203522 - 2017-11-29
of discretion” since 1992, when our supreme court replaced the phrase with “erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203522 - 2017-11-29
Julie Casper v. Bayfield County Board of Adjustment
. of Adj., 2001 WI 78, ¶25, 628 N.W.2d 376. Our review of the board of adjustment’s decision is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5199 - 2005-03-31
. of Adj., 2001 WI 78, ¶25, 628 N.W.2d 376. Our review of the board of adjustment’s decision is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522185 - 2022-05-18
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522185 - 2022-05-18
State v. Quentin D.
that their safety was in jeopardy.” Although our review of the trial court’s legal conclusions is de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15450 - 2005-03-31
that their safety was in jeopardy.” Although our review of the trial court’s legal conclusions is de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15450 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerald J. McDowell
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10604 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10604 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry L. Cox
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13644 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13644 - 2005-03-31