Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 30072 for de.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 30072 for de.
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to grant a defendant a Machner hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ruffin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
to grant a defendant a Machner hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ruffin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶9 As noted, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶9 As noted, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then addressed Essa’s request to modify maintenance. Essa argued that Mary was in a de facto marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21
then addressed Essa’s request to modify maintenance. Essa argued that Mary was in a de facto marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
, and Spickler appeals. ANALYSIS We review the Commission’s decision and order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
, and Spickler appeals. ANALYSIS We review the Commission’s decision and order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
). However, whether Mary Jane met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15820 - 2017-09-21
). However, whether Mary Jane met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15820 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 Standard of Review. ¶11 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177449 - 2017-09-21
6 Standard of Review. ¶11 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177449 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21