Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 30070 for de.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 30070 for de.
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶9 As noted, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶9 As noted, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then addressed Essa’s request to modify maintenance. Essa argued that Mary was in a de facto marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21
then addressed Essa’s request to modify maintenance. Essa argued that Mary was in a de facto marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
, and Spickler appeals. ANALYSIS We review the Commission’s decision and order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
, and Spickler appeals. ANALYSIS We review the Commission’s decision and order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where the issue is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68323 - 2011-07-20
reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where the issue is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68323 - 2011-07-20
[PDF]
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
). However, whether Mary Jane met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15820 - 2017-09-21
). However, whether Mary Jane met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15820 - 2017-09-21