Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 68502 for did.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
However, when the judge—who appeared at the hearing by telephone—informed Gering he did not accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38345 - 2014-09-15
However, when the judge—who appeared at the hearing by telephone—informed Gering he did not accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38345 - 2014-09-15
Amy Sue Halvorsen v. Ronald Martin Halvorsen
exercised its discretion when it did not deviate from the requirement that property be divided equally, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4473 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion when it did not deviate from the requirement that property be divided equally, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4473 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
State v. Lawrence Dean
. Because the trial court did not err in denying Dean's suppression motion, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10895 - 2005-03-31
. Because the trial court did not err in denying Dean's suppression motion, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
had not shown excusable neglect for not responding to the small-claims complaint and that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30224 - 2007-09-10
had not shown excusable neglect for not responding to the small-claims complaint and that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30224 - 2007-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
—who appeared at the hearing by telephone—informed Gering he did not accept Alford pleas, Gering’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38345 - 2009-07-27
—who appeared at the hearing by telephone—informed Gering he did not accept Alford pleas, Gering’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38345 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
Amy Sue Halvorsen v. Ronald Martin Halvorsen
exercised its discretion when it did not deviate from the No. 01-2711 2 requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4473 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion when it did not deviate from the No. 01-2711 2 requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4473 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Childeric Maxy v. Julia Meyer
filed his complaint on June 16, 2000, and the return date was scheduled for July 7, 2000. Maxy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3506 - 2017-09-19
filed his complaint on June 16, 2000, and the return date was scheduled for July 7, 2000. Maxy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and photographs at trial; and “consult more” with Thurber prior to trial. We conclude the court 1 did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172253 - 2017-09-21
and photographs at trial; and “consult more” with Thurber prior to trial. We conclude the court 1 did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172253 - 2017-09-21
State v. Natisha W.
the jury’s verdict, not for evidence to support a verdict that the jury could have reached but did not.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6451 - 2005-03-31
the jury’s verdict, not for evidence to support a verdict that the jury could have reached but did not.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6451 - 2005-03-31