Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 3809 for dollar.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 3809 for dollar.
Sauk County v. Verda C.R.
spent hundreds of dollars on clothing which she then gave away. Dr. Thiel observed Verda interject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13327 - 2005-03-31
spent hundreds of dollars on clothing which she then gave away. Dr. Thiel observed Verda interject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13327 - 2005-03-31
Westridge Builders, Inc. v. Linda A. Fridlington
-2000). [1] The dollar amounts are not in dispute. The dispute centers on the nature of the damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2631 - 2005-03-31
-2000). [1] The dollar amounts are not in dispute. The dispute centers on the nature of the damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2631 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ira Lee Anderson II v. Jane Gamble
resources that could be put to better use. Taxpayer dollars are needlessly expended as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4536 - 2017-09-19
resources that could be put to better use. Taxpayer dollars are needlessly expended as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4536 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carolyn Rae Jarman v. Larry Howard Welter
, the child support payment was converted from a percentage of gross income to a fixed dollar amount based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21398 - 2017-09-21
, the child support payment was converted from a percentage of gross income to a fixed dollar amount based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Zahrobsky’s estate was worth just over one million dollars. ¶4 Wade Blakey, one of Zahrobsky’s nephews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28422 - 2014-09-15
. Zahrobsky’s estate was worth just over one million dollars. ¶4 Wade Blakey, one of Zahrobsky’s nephews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28422 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(about fifty-dollars’ worth) to a confidential informant. The State had agreed to dismiss the repeater
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381396 - 2021-06-30
(about fifty-dollars’ worth) to a confidential informant. The State had agreed to dismiss the repeater
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381396 - 2021-06-30
[PDF]
Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
of One ($1.00) Dollar and other valuable considerations, to it in hand duly paid, receipt whereof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19
of One ($1.00) Dollar and other valuable considerations, to it in hand duly paid, receipt whereof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. Capt. Joseph Topp
deducting twenty-five dollars from Reimann's inmate account for court fees. Reimann argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7746 - 2017-09-19
deducting twenty-five dollars from Reimann's inmate account for court fees. Reimann argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7746 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the balance of his options, about $8895 a few weeks later.[1] The distributions did not indicate a dollar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74021 - 2011-11-22
the balance of his options, about $8895 a few weeks later.[1] The distributions did not indicate a dollar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74021 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Mary E. Gruber
, is false. There is no requirement that the false portion meet any specific dollar amount.” Id. An item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21619 - 2017-09-21
, is false. There is no requirement that the false portion meet any specific dollar amount.” Id. An item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21619 - 2017-09-21