Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the one-year statutory redemption period, a sheriff’s deed was issued to Foltz on September 14, 2009. Six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139858 - 2015-05-12
of the one-year statutory redemption period, a sheriff’s deed was issued to Foltz on September 14, 2009. Six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139858 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Milwaukee St., Ste. 550 P.O. Box 1000 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Boscobel, WI 53805-1000 You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299978 - 2020-10-26
. Milwaukee St., Ste. 550 P.O. Box 1000 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Boscobel, WI 53805-1000 You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299978 - 2020-10-26
Land Title Services, Inc. v. Donald W. Kemnitz, Jr.
a small-claims judgment dismissing its claims against Kara L. Kemnitz after a bench trial. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31
a small-claims judgment dismissing its claims against Kara L. Kemnitz after a bench trial. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, the Green Lake County Surveyor, Green Lake Register of Deeds Office, and the townships of Marquette
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67355 - 2011-07-05
, the Green Lake County Surveyor, Green Lake Register of Deeds Office, and the townships of Marquette
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67355 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
WI 56
of Deeds Office, and the townships of Marquette and Green Lake, Ingram further averred that Highway B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67355 - 2014-09-15
of Deeds Office, and the townships of Marquette and Green Lake, Ingram further averred that Highway B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67355 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 160
v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI App 194, ¶1, 256 Wis. 2d 1000, 651 N.W.2d 890, differed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57082 - 2014-09-15
v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI App 194, ¶1, 256 Wis. 2d 1000, 651 N.W.2d 890, differed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57082 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion. We reject David’s claims and affirm the judgment. ¶2 David and Tana were married
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30794 - 2007-11-06
of discretion. We reject David’s claims and affirm the judgment. ¶2 David and Tana were married
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30794 - 2007-11-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
David’s claims and affirm the judgment. ¶2 David and Tana were married in October 1980. The divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30794 - 2014-09-15
David’s claims and affirm the judgment. ¶2 David and Tana were married in October 1980. The divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 182
coverage for the claims. We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2002, Ernest/Cherie, a real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42965 - 2014-09-15
coverage for the claims. We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2002, Ernest/Cherie, a real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42965 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Barbara Ann Villwock v. Robert M. Villwock
$1000 towards Barbara’s attorney’s fees. We NO. 96-2988 2 conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11577 - 2017-09-19
$1000 towards Barbara’s attorney’s fees. We NO. 96-2988 2 conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11577 - 2017-09-19