Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 49388 for writ of certiorari forms -(/1000).
Search results 1121 - 1130 of 49388 for writ of certiorari forms -(/1000).
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
three parcels whose rezoning Friends sought to set aside by way of a writ of certiorari. Ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27536 - 2006-12-20
three parcels whose rezoning Friends sought to set aside by way of a writ of certiorari. Ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27536 - 2006-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. There was no “waiver.” ¶19 We affirm the circuit court’s denial of Barbian’s petition for a writ of certiorari.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30658 - 2007-10-22
. There was no “waiver.” ¶19 We affirm the circuit court’s denial of Barbian’s petition for a writ of certiorari.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30658 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a writ of certiorari.3 By the Court.—Order affirmed. Publication in the official reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30658 - 2014-09-15
for a writ of certiorari.3 By the Court.—Order affirmed. Publication in the official reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30658 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted cases 2017AP2244, 2018AP547, 2018AP1114
decisions after receipt of a writ of certiorari action. Whether the court of appeals determination
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275407 - 2020-07-31
decisions after receipt of a writ of certiorari action. Whether the court of appeals determination
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275407 - 2020-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
….”). No. 2016AP2113 3 ¶4 On November 5, 2015, Gomez filed a complaint for certiorari, alleging that the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204522 - 2017-12-06
….”). No. 2016AP2113 3 ¶4 On November 5, 2015, Gomez filed a complaint for certiorari, alleging that the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204522 - 2017-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons discussed below, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons discussed below, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
a circuit court order that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
a circuit court order that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
. 2d at 119. Berschens states: “The court may not, upon a common law writ of certiorari, go beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030583 - 2025-10-28
. 2d at 119. Berschens states: “The court may not, upon a common law writ of certiorari, go beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030583 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
. 2d at 119. Berschens states: “The court may not, upon a common law writ of certiorari, go beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030573 - 2025-10-28
. 2d at 119. Berschens states: “The court may not, upon a common law writ of certiorari, go beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030573 - 2025-10-28
Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31