Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11211 - 11220 of 63721 for records/1000.
Search results 11211 - 11220 of 63721 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in his first § 974.06 motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
in his first § 974.06 motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. After reviewing the Record and 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983746 - 2025-07-16
not responded. After reviewing the Record and 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983746 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201035 - 2017-11-02
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201035 - 2017-11-02
CA Blank Order
considered the no-merit report and independently reviewed the record as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98374 - 2013-06-25
considered the no-merit report and independently reviewed the record as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98374 - 2013-06-25
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. Brittany
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146996 - 2015-08-24
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. Brittany
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146996 - 2015-08-24
State v. Bobbie Torry
until October 8, 2001, for a trial that began October 31, 2001. As the State points out, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5968 - 2005-03-31
until October 8, 2001, for a trial that began October 31, 2001. As the State points out, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5968 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). After reviewing the record in this case, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15
is clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). After reviewing the record in this case, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
, “a discretionary determination must be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18407 - 2017-09-21
, “a discretionary determination must be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18407 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Benson did not file a response. Upon review of the no-merit report, the supplement, and the Records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98849 - 2014-09-15
. Benson did not file a response. Upon review of the no-merit report, the supplement, and the Records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lori J. Schroeder
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21

