Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11211 - 11220 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 11211 - 11220 of 83389 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449451 - 2021-11-04
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449451 - 2021-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
the case, (2) a party will be unduly prejudiced by submission of the exhibit, and (3) the exhibit could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84546 - 2012-07-10
the case, (2) a party will be unduly prejudiced by submission of the exhibit, and (3) the exhibit could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84546 - 2012-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to properly consider the case, (2) a party will be unduly prejudiced by submission of the exhibit, and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84546 - 2014-09-15
to properly consider the case, (2) a party will be unduly prejudiced by submission of the exhibit, and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84546 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to obtain some “good nug” for the meeting. ¶6 After Scott’s arrest, police executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207493 - 2018-01-23
to obtain some “good nug” for the meeting. ¶6 After Scott’s arrest, police executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207493 - 2018-01-23
CA Blank Order
is everything,” and “where’s the stuff,” while Murray and Whiteside searched the apartment. When Murray
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
is everything,” and “where’s the stuff,” while Murray and Whiteside searched the apartment. When Murray
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case, the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion and violated D.T.’s due process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162256 - 2017-09-21
of the case, the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion and violated D.T.’s due process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Huber
. To challenge a warrantless search or seizure, one must show a legitimate expectation of privacy in the thing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6043 - 2017-09-19
. To challenge a warrantless search or seizure, one must show a legitimate expectation of privacy in the thing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6043 - 2017-09-19
State v. Edward W. Ruzga
suitable for their conversation.[2] See 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 9.4(a) (4th ed. 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
suitable for their conversation.[2] See 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 9.4(a) (4th ed. 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, as a repeater. The case was tried to a jury. Garcia’s defense was that another man, Christopher Jackson, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30118 - 2014-09-15
, as a repeater. The case was tried to a jury. Garcia’s defense was that another man, Christopher Jackson, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30118 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree intentional homicide by use of a dangerous weapon, as a repeater. The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30118 - 2007-08-29
-degree intentional homicide by use of a dangerous weapon, as a repeater. The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30118 - 2007-08-29