Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 84336 for case number.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 84336 for case number.
CA Blank Order
five feet tall and dark blue, with a large number of stickers on it. An employee confirmed the missing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143492 - 2015-06-29
five feet tall and dark blue, with a large number of stickers on it. An employee confirmed the missing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143492 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, and which includes the same citation number as the Notice of Intent to Revoke Operating Privilege issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147080 - 2015-08-25
, and which includes the same citation number as the Notice of Intent to Revoke Operating Privilege issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147080 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Johnson
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6392 - 2017-09-19
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6392 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Marlon Arms
stipulation would have affected the result of the case. Arms next claims that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10208 - 2017-09-20
stipulation would have affected the result of the case. Arms next claims that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10208 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was positive for THC. In rendering its decision, the sentencing court reiterated the facts of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531604 - 2022-06-21
was positive for THC. In rendering its decision, the sentencing court reiterated the facts of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531604 - 2022-06-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2022AP1323-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730325 - 2023-11-21
No. 2022AP1323-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730325 - 2023-11-21
State v. Mark A. Johnson
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted on the June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6392 - 2005-03-31
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted on the June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the same citation number as the Notice of Intent to Revoke Operating Privilege issued on the same date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147080 - 2017-09-21
the same citation number as the Notice of Intent to Revoke Operating Privilege issued on the same date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227401 - 2018-11-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227401 - 2018-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” On that basis, Dernbach applied for a warrant to search for drugs at 1707 Velp Avenue, apartment number one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
.” On that basis, Dernbach applied for a warrant to search for drugs at 1707 Velp Avenue, apartment number one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05