Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the application of constitutional principles to those findings of fact de novo. State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001019 - 2025-08-26
the application of constitutional principles to those findings of fact de novo. State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001019 - 2025-08-26
M-P Enterprises, Ltd. v. Society Insurance
the amended order. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12827 - 2005-03-31
the amended order. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12827 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16
State v. Derrick Emerson
(2) and 971.08 to undisputed facts and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
(2) and 971.08 to undisputed facts and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to an evidentiary hearing on a Bangert claim is an issue appellate courts review de novo. State v. Howell, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108175 - 2014-02-17
to an evidentiary hearing on a Bangert claim is an issue appellate courts review de novo. State v. Howell, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108175 - 2014-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
is final for the purposes of judicial review is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31482 - 2008-01-14
is final for the purposes of judicial review is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31482 - 2008-01-14
2007 WI 21
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28172 - 2007-02-15
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28172 - 2007-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36847 - 2009-06-22
facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36847 - 2009-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that is subject to de novo review.); see also Harris v. Reivitz, 142 Wis. 2d 82, 88, 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107362 - 2014-01-27
a question of law that is subject to de novo review.); see also Harris v. Reivitz, 142 Wis. 2d 82, 88, 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107362 - 2014-01-27
State v. Moses Sean P.
at 684. Whether a petition shows prosecutive merit presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8981 - 2005-03-31
at 684. Whether a petition shows prosecutive merit presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8981 - 2005-03-31