Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 50108 for our.

State v. Jerry Lee Cox
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13800 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, act in an impartial manner.” Because our review is limited to whether the judge made the required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144916 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92104 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138018 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
in the criminal complaint and ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92807 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review of the record confirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573562 - 2022-10-04

CA Blank Order
was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98214 - 2013-06-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
battery on a person. Arrowood was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21