Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 50122 for our.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 50122 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138475 - 2017-09-21
following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Whitewater v. Elizabeth M. Neldner
the particular issue Neldner raises, that fact alone does not capture our discussion of the fourth reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15240 - 2017-09-21
the particular issue Neldner raises, that fact alone does not capture our discussion of the fourth reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15240 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249779 - 2019-11-05
not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249779 - 2019-11-05
[PDF]
Myra Levine (Heilprin) v. Richard Heilprin
1 Heilprin's argument to the trial court, that our stay in the first appeal precluded execution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8544 - 2017-09-19
1 Heilprin's argument to the trial court, that our stay in the first appeal precluded execution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8544 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139096 - 2017-09-21
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139096 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608829 - 2023-01-10
Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608829 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence. Resolving this factual discrepancy is unnecessary to our decision because the issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29965 - 2014-09-15
sentence. Resolving this factual discrepancy is unnecessary to our decision because the issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29965 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195667 - 2017-09-21
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195667 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132591 - 2017-09-21
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ineffective by failing to advocate for less than the maximum term of commitment. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535512 - 2022-06-23
was ineffective by failing to advocate for less than the maximum term of commitment. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535512 - 2022-06-23