Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 11221 - 11230 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
in suspicious activity. Officers subsequently searched Lindell and discovered stitching removed from the seam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6890 - 2017-09-20
in suspicious activity. Officers subsequently searched Lindell and discovered stitching removed from the seam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6890 - 2017-09-20
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
searched Lindell and discovered stitching removed from the seam of his shirt. They also searched his cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
searched Lindell and discovered stitching removed from the seam of his shirt. They also searched his cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a commonsense test. Id., ¶13. ¶3 The crucial question is whether the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36470 - 2009-05-12
of reasonableness is a commonsense test. Id., ¶13. ¶3 The crucial question is whether the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36470 - 2009-05-12
State v. Joseph Keepers
that Keepers had an outstanding warrant. He was placed under arrest. During a custodial search of Keepers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31
that Keepers had an outstanding warrant. He was placed under arrest. During a custodial search of Keepers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but the drive to the gas station in Campbellsport was “an easy drive.” ¶4 Volm conducted a search of Ramthun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
, but the drive to the gas station in Campbellsport was “an easy drive.” ¶4 Volm conducted a search of Ramthun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law. However, we must search 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32295 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law. However, we must search 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32295 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges in this case arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259987 - 2020-05-12
. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges in this case arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259987 - 2020-05-12
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2006
the cases are heard. It is suggested that you confirm the time and date of any case you are interested
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21473 - 2017-09-21
the cases are heard. It is suggested that you confirm the time and date of any case you are interested
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21473 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
and, on February 3, 2001, at approximately 3:30 a.m., they entered the building pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7289 - 2017-09-20
and, on February 3, 2001, at approximately 3:30 a.m., they entered the building pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7289 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
, Search and Seizure § 3.2(d), at 58-59 & nn.134-35 (4th ed. 2004) (collecting cases holding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36808 - 2009-06-15
, Search and Seizure § 3.2(d), at 58-59 & nn.134-35 (4th ed. 2004) (collecting cases holding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36808 - 2009-06-15