Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11231 - 11240 of 49819 for our.
Search results 11231 - 11240 of 49819 for our.
State v. Rudolfo Briseno
substituting our judgment for the trier of fact unless the fact finder relied on evidence which was inherently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9408 - 2005-03-31
substituting our judgment for the trier of fact unless the fact finder relied on evidence which was inherently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9408 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marco A. Delatorre
of conviction. Appellate counsel has concluded and our review of the record confirms that Delatorre’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14676 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. Appellate counsel has concluded and our review of the record confirms that Delatorre’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record persuades us that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231720 - 2019-01-09
was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record persuades us that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231720 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
City of Prairie Du Chien v. George J. Eastman
as a foundation for the admission of a breath[] test." Id. at 673, 674, 314 N.W.2d at 912, 913. We based our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8576 - 2017-09-19
as a foundation for the admission of a breath[] test." Id. at 673, 674, 314 N.W.2d at 912, 913. We based our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8576 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
Patricia S. Vander Bloemen v. State of Wisconsin Deparment of Natural Resources
a question of law which we review de novo. Ours is not a de novo standard of review. The decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9270 - 2017-09-19
a question of law which we review de novo. Ours is not a de novo standard of review. The decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9270 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
best interests. Shannondooa was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97823 - 2014-09-15
best interests. Shannondooa was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263159 - 2020-06-04
sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263159 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249779 - 2019-11-05
not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249779 - 2019-11-05