Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 98503 for court records search online.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 98503 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Margo S. Lawinger
and the search incident to that arrest unlawful under the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 31. The Court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12709 - 2017-09-21
and the search incident to that arrest unlawful under the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 31. The Court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 6, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67144 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 6, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67144 - 2014-09-15
County of Green Lake v. John T. Welke
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2000 Cornelia G. Clark Acting Clerk, Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16074 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2000 Cornelia G. Clark Acting Clerk, Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16074 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Geoffrey K. Turk
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 5, 1998 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13210 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 5, 1998 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13210 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
the ordinance and that, therefore, the search was lawful.[2] The trial court denied Hnanicek's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
the ordinance and that, therefore, the search was lawful.[2] The trial court denied Hnanicek's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
State v. Geoffrey K. Turk
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 5, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13210 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 5, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court is to search the record for reasons to sustain the [circuit] court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517333 - 2022-05-03
court is to search the record for reasons to sustain the [circuit] court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517333 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of record and an appropriate application of the law. Id. Our role as an appellate court is to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79514 - 2014-09-15
of record and an appropriate application of the law. Id. Our role as an appellate court is to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79514 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court must “specify the objectives of the sentence on the record. These objectives include
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454436 - 2021-11-23
. The circuit court must “specify the objectives of the sentence on the record. These objectives include
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454436 - 2021-11-23
State v. Daniel M. Abraham
). Based on the record provided, we see no basis to overturn the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5658 - 2005-03-31
). Based on the record provided, we see no basis to overturn the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5658 - 2005-03-31