Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 69479 for had.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 69479 for had.
[PDF]
Mark A. Sanders v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
.” The trial court had entered a scheduling order, which provided that any such motion must be brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14731 - 2017-09-21
.” The trial court had entered a scheduling order, which provided that any such motion must be brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14731 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
760, 796 N.W.2d 429 (citation omitted). ¶4 Lane’s residence had a front door on the northern side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061333 - 2026-01-13
760, 796 N.W.2d 429 (citation omitted). ¶4 Lane’s residence had a front door on the northern side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061333 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
Kara B. v. Dane County
of investigating the assault, police contacted Kara B., who told them that she too had been sexually abused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16910 - 2017-09-21
of investigating the assault, police contacted Kara B., who told them that she too had been sexually abused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16910 - 2017-09-21
Mary Garvin v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
, “That’s correct, Your Honor.” The trial court had entered a scheduling order, which provided that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14521 - 2005-03-31
, “That’s correct, Your Honor.” The trial court had entered a scheduling order, which provided that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14521 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In essence, Specworks asserted that it had overpaid King for embroidery services by $28,425.97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130683 - 2026-06-16
. In essence, Specworks asserted that it had overpaid King for embroidery services by $28,425.97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130683 - 2026-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
Papers’ brief-in-chief suggests that its defense costs had already exceeded $5,000,000 by the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27163 - 2014-09-15
Papers’ brief-in-chief suggests that its defense costs had already exceeded $5,000,000 by the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27163 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress. The court set forth in detail its reasoning for doing so. [Castaneda] had just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50893 - 2010-06-14
motion to suppress. The court set forth in detail its reasoning for doing so. [Castaneda] had just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50893 - 2010-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
bail jumping charge stemmed from the fact that Castaneda had been charged, several weeks earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
bail jumping charge stemmed from the fact that Castaneda had been charged, several weeks earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Instead, after Felix provided the drugs, Williquette told Felix that he had a gun, but Felix did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064707 - 2026-01-21
.” Instead, after Felix provided the drugs, Williquette told Felix that he had a gun, but Felix did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064707 - 2026-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the Estate had no assets remaining, the court entered an order requiring each beneficiary to deposit $5,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69432 - 2011-08-10
the Estate had no assets remaining, the court entered an order requiring each beneficiary to deposit $5,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69432 - 2011-08-10