Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 50071 for our.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 50071 for our.
CA Blank Order
with counsel that a challenge to Smith’s sentence would lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91690 - 2013-01-13
with counsel that a challenge to Smith’s sentence would lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91690 - 2013-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion requesting 498 days of sentencing credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
motion requesting 498 days of sentencing credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142821 - 2015-06-02
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142821 - 2015-06-02
State v. Jerald J. McDowell
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10604 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10604 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of habeas corpus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144395 - 2015-07-09
of habeas corpus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144395 - 2015-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record persuades us that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231720 - 2019-01-09
was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record persuades us that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231720 - 2019-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
or not. ¶7 Our jurisdiction in an appeal such as this is confined only to the jurisdictional question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89798 - 2012-12-03
or not. ¶7 Our jurisdiction in an appeal such as this is confined only to the jurisdictional question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89798 - 2012-12-03
CA Blank Order
a police animal. Hussey was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133308 - 2015-01-20
a police animal. Hussey was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133308 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to reopen a judgment on damages and an order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154986 - 2017-09-21
motion to reopen a judgment on damages and an order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cameron D.
). However, in State v. Cesar G., 2004 WI 61, ¶40, 272 Wis. 2d 22, 682 N.W.2d 1, our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24629 - 2017-09-21
). However, in State v. Cesar G., 2004 WI 61, ¶40, 272 Wis. 2d 22, 682 N.W.2d 1, our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24629 - 2017-09-21