Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 63721 for records/1000.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 63721 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. George F. Johnson
the State’s failure to give written notice of its intent to introduce DNA evidence. The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3507 - 2017-09-19
the State’s failure to give written notice of its intent to introduce DNA evidence. The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3507 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assigned to a different judge for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
assigned to a different judge for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Becker
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10497 - 2017-09-20
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10497 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
“when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51347 - 2010-06-29
“when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51347 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241052 - 2019-05-21
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241052 - 2019-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
noted. No. 2021AP1508-NM 2 court’s independent review of the record, as required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684085 - 2023-08-01
noted. No. 2021AP1508-NM 2 court’s independent review of the record, as required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684085 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the PSI contained inaccurate information about his criminal record by greatly exaggerating the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34511 - 2014-09-15
that the PSI contained inaccurate information about his criminal record by greatly exaggerating the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34511 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report, Vogel’s response, and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665145 - 2023-06-07
consideration of the report, Vogel’s response, and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665145 - 2023-06-07