Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 43775 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Pembuat Kitchen Set Mewah Profesional Pakem Sleman.

COURT OF APPEALS
. (citation omitted). Whether a given set of facts amount to ineffective assistance is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25

[PDF] State v. Tony P. Gildemeister
sentence modification. Id. ¶8 A new factor is: “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25573 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Joseph W. Volkmann v. Superior Home Services, Inc.
schedule, and specified the term of the agreement. The second, referred to as Addendum A, set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4689 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. App. 1987). The facts set forth in the complaint provided a sufficient factual basis for the pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164683 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark Cianciolo
as “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8114 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 The definition of a new factor is set forth in case law. It is “‘a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714053 - 2023-10-12

COURT OF APPEALS
about Christopher’s appearance” and setting up a teleconference with Christopher, the court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135538 - 2015-02-24

State v. Shawn Darnell Nunnery
was not a new factor. We agree. A new factor is a: fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12433 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony A. Suslick
with Suslick before accepting his pleas. On the day set for sentencing, the defense moved to allow Suslick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2836 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not set forth any facts to establish that his and his predecessor’s use of the driveway was adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67958 - 2014-09-15