Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 69145 for did.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 69145 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Because we conclude that the State did not have a duty to preserve the evidence, we affirm. ¶2 In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28488 - 2014-09-15
. Because we conclude that the State did not have a duty to preserve the evidence, we affirm. ¶2 In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28488 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for an examination of alleged sexual abuse. The examining nurse did not find evidence of sexual abuse, but concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28601 - 2007-03-28
for an examination of alleged sexual abuse. The examining nurse did not find evidence of sexual abuse, but concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28601 - 2007-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Council and, if he did, whether DeBraska knew that Kalwitz did not have authority to allow him to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75794 - 2014-09-15
Council and, if he did, whether DeBraska knew that Kalwitz did not have authority to allow him to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
motion. Cole argues that at his initial appearance he did not receive a copy of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9888 - 2017-09-19
motion. Cole argues that at his initial appearance he did not receive a copy of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9888 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
effort to provide those services was made. She pointed out that the court order did not specify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53438 - 2010-08-17
effort to provide those services was made. She pointed out that the court order did not specify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53438 - 2010-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
Thompson’s claim is based on a violation of the Open Meetings Law, and because he did not follow the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48114 - 2010-03-17
Thompson’s claim is based on a violation of the Open Meetings Law, and because he did not follow the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48114 - 2010-03-17
CA Blank Order
plan of $200 per month. The order did not specify the outstanding amount, but was based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95160 - 2013-04-03
plan of $200 per month. The order did not specify the outstanding amount, but was based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95160 - 2013-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Smith did not ask the court for an evidentiary hearing, and did not describe evidence or identify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
, Smith did not ask the court for an evidentiary hearing, and did not describe evidence or identify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Because the circuit No. 2005AP3115-CR 2 court did not erroneously exercise discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27844 - 2014-09-15
. Because the circuit No. 2005AP3115-CR 2 court did not erroneously exercise discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27844 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
did not consent and there was no lawful authority to confine or restrain the victim. Wis JI—Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36380 - 2009-05-05
did not consent and there was no lawful authority to confine or restrain the victim. Wis JI—Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36380 - 2009-05-05