Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 50070 for our.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. As to the first issue, our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
sentencing discretion. As to the first issue, our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an improper legal standard and that there was insufficient evidence to support its findings. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657517 - 2023-05-17
an improper legal standard and that there was insufficient evidence to support its findings. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657517 - 2023-05-17
CA Blank Order
752, 734 N.W.2d 169. Our review of the trial transcripts persuades us that the State produced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143206 - 2015-06-23
752, 734 N.W.2d 169. Our review of the trial transcripts persuades us that the State produced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143206 - 2015-06-23
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
and is familiar with local billing norms. Id. Therefore, “we do not substitute our judgment for the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
and is familiar with local billing norms. Id. Therefore, “we do not substitute our judgment for the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the original sentencing. Id., ¶35 n.8. Our review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that none
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208792 - 2018-02-28
at the original sentencing. Id., ¶35 n.8. Our review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that none
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208792 - 2018-02-28
[PDF]
State v. Leporld L. Miller
being called but after the swearing in of the jury.” The State agrees that our decision in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8511 - 2017-09-19
being called but after the swearing in of the jury.” The State agrees that our decision in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
should exercise our discretionary authority to grant him a new trial. We reject Dagnall’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24497 - 2017-09-21
should exercise our discretionary authority to grant him a new trial. We reject Dagnall’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24497 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
CA Blank Order
imposition of sentence following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109743 - 2014-03-26
imposition of sentence following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109743 - 2014-03-26