Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 64079 for records/1000.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 64079 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. Brittany
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146996 - 2015-08-24
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. Brittany
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146996 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has not filed a response. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715855 - 2023-10-17
, and has not filed a response. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715855 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Becker
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10497 - 2017-09-20
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10497 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Lori J. Schroeder
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102772 - 2013-10-08
review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102772 - 2013-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
educational records were produced at the suppression hearing and show that he consistently was below peer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27597 - 2006-12-26
educational records were produced at the suppression hearing and show that he consistently was below peer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27597 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165707 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165707 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not seen this case before and is not privy to any of this record.” ¶3 The judge who resentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
not seen this case before and is not privy to any of this record.” ¶3 The judge who resentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698437 - 2023-09-06
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698437 - 2023-09-06