Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11251 - 11260 of 58312 for speedy trial.

State v. Michael W. Jones
the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion without a hearing; and whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10603 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky L. Thom
. The issues are whether the trial court erred in limiting the admissibility of Thom's post-polygraph
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8783 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nicholas S. Cole
pleas were invalid because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude that Cole’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Sveum
motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98).1 He claims that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jason D. VanStraten
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), third offense. He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6604 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Gerhartz argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his counsel did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41403 - 2009-09-29

[PDF] Misdemeanor disposition summary: County and district
Trial Court Trial Plead Before Trial Dismissed Before Trial Other Median Age at Disposition Battery
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/misdemeanorcounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Earnestine Jones, Jerrel Jones, and Mary Ellen Strong.1 Radio Multi Media argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102001 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Empire Screen Printing, Inc. v. Park Bank
. Respondents also challenge the trial court’s denial of their motions for relief from judgment and for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11808 - 2017-09-21

Empire Screen Printing, Inc. v. Park Bank
. Respondents also challenge the trial court’s denial of their motions for relief from judgment and for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11808 - 2005-03-31