Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11261 - 11270 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 11261 - 11270 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107042 - 2014-01-21
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107042 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and lacked probable cause to arrest him for obstructing an officer, invalidating the search incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72999 - 2011-10-31
, and lacked probable cause to arrest him for obstructing an officer, invalidating the search incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72999 - 2011-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an officer, invalidating the search incident to arrest. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72999 - 2014-09-15
an officer, invalidating the search incident to arrest. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107042 - 2017-09-21
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107042 - 2017-09-21
D.S. Farms v. Northern States Power Company
not apply to the facts of this case. NSP relies on Snyder v. Oakdale Co-Op. Elec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7983 - 2005-03-31
not apply to the facts of this case. NSP relies on Snyder v. Oakdale Co-Op. Elec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to suppress the fruits of his vehicle search and the State filed a response. The parties agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191380 - 2017-09-21
a motion to suppress the fruits of his vehicle search and the State filed a response. The parties agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 163 Ind. App. 35, 321 N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35930 - 2014-09-15
, 163 Ind. App. 35, 321 N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
County deputy’s affidavit in support of the search warrant for a blood draw averred that the witness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175543 - 2017-09-21
County deputy’s affidavit in support of the search warrant for a blood draw averred that the witness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175543 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35930 - 2009-03-18
N.E.2d 760 (1975), wherein the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated a search in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35930 - 2009-03-18
City of Stevens Point v. Michael C. Wirtz
while intoxicated cases. ¶4 Officer Uitenbroek testified that on August 25, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3844 - 2005-03-31
while intoxicated cases. ¶4 Officer Uitenbroek testified that on August 25, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3844 - 2005-03-31