Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11271 - 11280 of 69587 for as he.
Search results 11271 - 11280 of 69587 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the judgment of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
appeals the judgment of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to February 20, March 1 to May 18, 2001, and that all other times until January 21, 2003, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66551 - 2014-09-15
to February 20, March 1 to May 18, 2001, and that all other times until January 21, 2003, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66551 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for disorderly conduct. ¶2 On appeal, Eggum argues that his tasteless retorts—which he now characterizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201428 - 2017-11-08
for disorderly conduct. ¶2 On appeal, Eggum argues that his tasteless retorts—which he now characterizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201428 - 2017-11-08
State v. Pao V.
the weapon about fifteen to thirty minutes after he was placed under arrest and handcuffed. Before engaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15806 - 2005-03-31
the weapon about fifteen to thirty minutes after he was placed under arrest and handcuffed. Before engaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15806 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin E. Daugherty
, identified himself as a police officer, and asked Daugherty if he was all right. Daugherty opened his door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25256 - 2017-09-21
, identified himself as a police officer, and asked Daugherty if he was all right. Daugherty opened his door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient performance. A reviewing court may dispose of a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190513 - 2017-09-21
and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient performance. A reviewing court may dispose of a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190513 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas L. Seeley
-degree intentional homicide, the resulting sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11076 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide, the resulting sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
modification. See State v. Singh, Nos. 2014AP846-CR & 2014AP847-CR. He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134577 - 2017-09-21
modification. See State v. Singh, Nos. 2014AP846-CR & 2014AP847-CR. He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134577 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn P. Krawczyk
that because he was unlawfully arrested he was justified in refusing a test of his blood-alcohol content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12598 - 2005-03-31
that because he was unlawfully arrested he was justified in refusing a test of his blood-alcohol content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12598 - 2005-03-31
Karen J. Miemietz v. George J. Miemietz
support order and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31
support order and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31