Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11271 - 11280 of 17654 for ex.

CA Blank Order
ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 605-06, 516 N.W.2d 362 (1994). This court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106582 - 2014-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
to issue summary reversal. See State ex. rel. Blackdeer v. Township of Levis, 176 Wis. 2d 252, 259-60, 500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103309 - 2013-10-23

[PDF] State v. Jose Nieves-Gonzalez
on his motion, the assertions in his motion should be construed liberally. See State ex rel. Harris v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2895 - 2017-09-19

Joseph F. Wisneski v. Calumet County Board Of Adjustments
the determination in question. State ex rel. Brookside Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Jefferson County Bd. of Adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8387 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07 will not be reversed on appeal absent an erroneous exercise of discretion. State ex rel. M.L.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180489 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeremy K. Morse
and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law. State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis. 2d 615, 635, 579
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19356 - 2005-10-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the approval of the court”); State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis. 2d 615, 651 n.21, 579 N.W.2d 698 (1998
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13

[PDF] Paul Johns v. County of Oneida
to reopen a judgment under § 806.07. State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis.2d 536, 541, 363 N.W.2d 419
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9776 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, 273 Wis. 2d 192, 682 N.W.2d 784, overruled on other grounds, State ex rel. Coleman v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15

State v. Gregory L. Hoover
right to be present at trial was violated when the bailiff, ex parte, dismissed the jury for the weekend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31