Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 57777 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Tukang Pasang Plafon PVC Ide Terpercaya Delanggu Klaten.

State v. Richard W. Foelker
this court reviews de novo. Id. Section 343.305(5), Stats., provides that a defendant has a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13633 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ignacio P. Gonzalez
discretion in dismissing the refusal charge. See id. at 359. The supreme court approved the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Pamela Smith-Herzog
a retrial because the circuit court premised its dismissal on an erroneous standard of review. Id. at 46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3498 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jimmy Williams
helped the defense is not sufficient. See id. at 321. ¶7 Williams failed to prove that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3123 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id.; WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (made applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285342 - 2020-09-09

State v. Antonio M. Settles
to be trustworthy. Id. The decision about whether to admit a statement as an excited utterance is left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3067 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Charles Newman
). A reviewing court may dispose of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on either ground. Id. at 697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6304 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
. Id. If grounds for termination are found to exist, the circuit court must find that the parent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98508 - 2013-06-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an available claim in an earlier motion or on direct appeal.” Id., ¶36. However, “a defendant who alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500457 - 2022-03-30