Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Craig A. Zempel
The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law that we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law that we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Patterson
, which we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
Arlo M. Tratz v. Sharon K. Zunker
§ 19.37(2)(a), Stats. All of the issues raise questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8924 - 2005-03-31
§ 19.37(2)(a), Stats. All of the issues raise questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8924 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward Leon Jackson
of law that we review de novo. Kohler, 248 Wis. 2d 259, ¶32. This case also requires us to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6731 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. Kohler, 248 Wis. 2d 259, ¶32. This case also requires us to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6731 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 To establish a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 To establish a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law subject to de novo review. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145440 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law subject to de novo review. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145440 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶8 Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43565 - 2014-09-15
. ¶8 Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43565 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Id. The question of whether a change is substantial is a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
. Id. The question of whether a change is substantial is a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment bars only unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31425 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment bars only unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31425 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Johnnie Hunter
a sentence on inaccurate information presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19
a sentence on inaccurate information presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19