Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 64077 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Becker
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10498 - 2017-09-20
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10498 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522581 - 2022-05-17
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522581 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
State v. Milton L. Wright
the sound discretion of the trial court whether to declare a mistrial, and the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12903 - 2017-09-21
the sound discretion of the trial court whether to declare a mistrial, and the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12903 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit reports, Vaughn’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213849 - 2018-06-06
consideration of the no-merit reports, Vaughn’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213849 - 2018-06-06
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
“when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
“when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assigned to a different judge for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
assigned to a different judge for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. It is also her “responsibility to ensure completion of the appellate record and ‘when an appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912531 - 2025-02-12
. It is also her “responsibility to ensure completion of the appellate record and ‘when an appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912531 - 2025-02-12
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
by Wisconsin law. The facts of record in this case are undisputed. Whether the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10489 - 2005-03-31
by Wisconsin law. The facts of record in this case are undisputed. Whether the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10489 - 2005-03-31
State v. George F. Johnson
to introduce DNA evidence. The record does not establish that Johnson was surprised by the introduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3507 - 2005-03-31
to introduce DNA evidence. The record does not establish that Johnson was surprised by the introduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3507 - 2005-03-31