Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 46746 for show's.
Search results 11281 - 11290 of 46746 for show's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in support of Arch Bay’s motion does not show that the affiant has personal knowledge to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86552 - 2014-09-15
in support of Arch Bay’s motion does not show that the affiant has personal knowledge to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86552 - 2014-09-15
State v. Katrina D. Campbell
whipped him with an extension cord. Scahill also noted a mark on Kevin’s left arm that showed recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
whipped him with an extension cord. Scahill also noted a mark on Kevin’s left arm that showed recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Jordan
of this opinion, we will assume that Jordan has met his burden to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21549 - 2017-09-21
of this opinion, we will assume that Jordan has met his burden to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21549 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw a plea after sentencing, a defendant must either show that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194127 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw a plea after sentencing, a defendant must either show that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194127 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tommie Thames
.” Thames argues that the complaint does not show that he intended to kill Bost when he shot him the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10041 - 2008-10-26
.” Thames argues that the complaint does not show that he intended to kill Bost when he shot him the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10041 - 2008-10-26
State v. Vernon H. Walker
and his first court appearance; (2) the on-site (“show-up”) identification procedure; (3) the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2006-08-29
and his first court appearance; (2) the on-site (“show-up”) identification procedure; (3) the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2006-08-29
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
court dismissing the State’s order to show cause why Christina M. Jacobson (formerly Goerlitz) should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
court dismissing the State’s order to show cause why Christina M. Jacobson (formerly Goerlitz) should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
representation, a defendant must show: (1) deficient representation; and (2) prejudice. Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2014-01-28
representation, a defendant must show: (1) deficient representation; and (2) prejudice. Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2014-01-28
State v. Perry R. Neal
show both (1) that his counsel’s representation was deficient and (2) that this deficiency prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31
show both (1) that his counsel’s representation was deficient and (2) that this deficiency prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21
). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21