Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11291 - 11300 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11291 - 11300 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
WI App 79
of law, which we review de novo. Seider v. O’Connell, 2000 WI 76, ¶26, 236 Wis. 2d 211, 612 N.W.2d 659
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198177 - 2018-08-23
of law, which we review de novo. Seider v. O’Connell, 2000 WI 76, ¶26, 236 Wis. 2d 211, 612 N.W.2d 659
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198177 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
State v. Steven Schelk
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in question, the court is not called upon to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59994 - 2014-09-15
in question, the court is not called upon to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Carl J. Bock
blood alcohol content, present questions of law which this court reviews de novo. Baldwin, 212 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13109 - 2017-09-21
blood alcohol content, present questions of law which this court reviews de novo. Baldwin, 212 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsections of WIS. STAT. § 84.30 and statutory interpretation is an issue of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231135 - 2019-05-23
subsections of WIS. STAT. § 84.30 and statutory interpretation is an issue of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231135 - 2019-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. Witkowski holds that a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. Witkowski holds that a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will be upheld “unless they are clearly erroneous[,]” but we review de novo “the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060000 - 2026-01-13
will be upheld “unless they are clearly erroneous[,]” but we review de novo “the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060000 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review. Johnson, 299 Wis. 2d 675, ¶13. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92890 - 2013-02-13
of law subject to de novo review. Johnson, 299 Wis. 2d 675, ¶13. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92890 - 2013-02-13
State v. Jeffrey J. Jacobsen
of this argument. ¶5 Jacobsen asserts that the standard of review is de novo, and the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7006 - 2005-03-31
of this argument. ¶5 Jacobsen asserts that the standard of review is de novo, and the State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7006 - 2005-03-31