Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11291 - 11300 of 68326 for did.
Search results 11291 - 11300 of 68326 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the defendant “to point to facts that demonstrate that he or she ‘did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35761 - 2009-03-10
requires the defendant “to point to facts that demonstrate that he or she ‘did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35761 - 2009-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
copy was filed. 2 He also argued the officer did not fulfill his duties under the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109207 - 2017-09-21
copy was filed. 2 He also argued the officer did not fulfill his duties under the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109207 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not fulfill his duties under the implied consent law. ¶5 The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
did not fulfill his duties under the implied consent law. ¶5 The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his no-contest plea. Before accepting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170461 - 2017-09-21
did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his no-contest plea. Before accepting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Credit Union for the repossession of a 2003 Lexus automobile. The Furrers argue that Summit did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87548 - 2014-09-15
Credit Union for the repossession of a 2003 Lexus automobile. The Furrers argue that Summit did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87548 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
K. William Allen Enterprises, Inc. v. Safeway Industries, Inc.
with the agreement. Because the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5477 - 2017-09-19
with the agreement. Because the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5477 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
that the trial court considered the necessary sentencing factors. Clearly, the trial court did place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court considered the necessary sentencing factors. Clearly, the trial court did place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
day of trial. At the postconviction motion hearing, defense counsel testified that he did not recall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65821 - 2011-06-14
day of trial. At the postconviction motion hearing, defense counsel testified that he did not recall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65821 - 2011-06-14
State v. Matthew L. Abad
the trial court’s finding that Abad’s decision to change his plea did not result from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5839 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s finding that Abad’s decision to change his plea did not result from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5839 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
investigation writer “did perform some actuarial assessment” and scored Zink at a higher number, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89103 - 2012-11-13
investigation writer “did perform some actuarial assessment” and scored Zink at a higher number, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89103 - 2012-11-13