Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11291 - 11300 of 68445 for did.
Search results 11291 - 11300 of 68445 for did.
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the circuit court because Keniston did not give notice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141127 - 2015-05-05
. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the circuit court because Keniston did not give notice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141127 - 2015-05-05
State v. Zenobia W.
the children had a substantial relationship with her. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6863 - 2005-03-31
the children had a substantial relationship with her. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6863 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of 2 Kettleson did not file a reply brief. No. 2012AP2230 3 the citizen-witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97435 - 2014-09-15
of 2 Kettleson did not file a reply brief. No. 2012AP2230 3 the citizen-witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97435 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald Boeshaar
was ineffective. Although the reasons are somewhat confusing, the main reasons appear to be: counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12310 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective. Although the reasons are somewhat confusing, the main reasons appear to be: counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
that the trial court considered the necessary sentencing factors. Clearly, the trial court did place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court considered the necessary sentencing factors. Clearly, the trial court did place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
State v. Adam C.
)(a) & 948.02(1), Stats. He claims that his trial lawyer did not give him effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14940 - 2005-03-31
)(a) & 948.02(1), Stats. He claims that his trial lawyer did not give him effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14940 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
837, 681 N.W.2d 272. Hart also testified that Hvizdak did not ask for, and Hart did not offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137922 - 2017-09-21
837, 681 N.W.2d 272. Hart also testified that Hvizdak did not ask for, and Hart did not offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Johnson
but not known to the trial court at the time of sentencing because it did not then exist or was unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14687 - 2017-09-21
but not known to the trial court at the time of sentencing because it did not then exist or was unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14687 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
) the court did not follow mandatory procedures regarding Maus’s waiver of counsel; (3) the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
) the court did not follow mandatory procedures regarding Maus’s waiver of counsel; (3) the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
did not understand the party-to-a-crime element. The circuit court denied the motion as procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2013-12-09
did not understand the party-to-a-crime element. The circuit court denied the motion as procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2013-12-09