Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶18 Our rules require an attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113750 - 2017-09-21
747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶18 Our rules require an attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113750 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
State v. Richard L. Bollig
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Demarrus D. Willis
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
La Crosse Professional Police Association v. City of LaCrosse
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Bollig
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to obtain certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
to obtain certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21