Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 29823 for des.
SCS of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Milwaukee County
, including the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2607 - 2005-03-31
, including the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marcia A. Klein v. Wisconsin Resource Center
.” After conducting a de novo review of the record request, the circuit court agreed with the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12177 - 2017-09-21
.” After conducting a de novo review of the record request, the circuit court agreed with the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review. The Halls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144403 - 2015-07-13
certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review. The Halls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144403 - 2015-07-13
State v. Richard L. Bollig
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Demarrus D. Willis
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
La Crosse Professional Police Association v. City of LaCrosse
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tamara G. Hernandez v. Randolph S. Allen
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21