Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 29713 for des.
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
, and Spickler appeals. ANALYSIS We review the Commission’s decision and order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
, and Spickler appeals. ANALYSIS We review the Commission’s decision and order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for de novo review of the family court commissioner’s decision. In support of that motion, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29
for de novo review of the family court commissioner’s decision. In support of that motion, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is more reasonable. Hillhaven, 232 Wis. 2d 400, ¶12 n.6. De novo review is appropriate where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Odell Carter, Jr.
must apply a de novo standard. Citing State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d 513, 521, 182 N.W.2d 232 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16067 - 2017-09-21
must apply a de novo standard. Citing State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d 513, 521, 182 N.W.2d 232 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16067 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review. The Halls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144403 - 2015-07-13
certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review. The Halls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144403 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to obtain certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
to obtain certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard L. Bollig
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tamara G. Hernandez v. Randolph S. Allen
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Bollig
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
La Crosse Professional Police Association v. City of LaCrosse
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31