Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 7604 for ow.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 7604 for ow.
COURT OF APPEALS
, determined that Latimer owed approximately $14,000 in rent, and granted the judgment of eviction. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
, determined that Latimer owed approximately $14,000 in rent, and granted the judgment of eviction. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in determining that they breached the contracts, that Rock & Tait’s work was not defective, and that they owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424507 - 2021-09-14
in determining that they breached the contracts, that Rock & Tait’s work was not defective, and that they owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424507 - 2021-09-14
[PDF]
Hudec Law Offices v. Darlyne Esser
thereof, [were], in fact, due and owing. Both parties emphatically stated that this matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6426 - 2017-09-19
thereof, [were], in fact, due and owing. Both parties emphatically stated that this matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6426 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
County’s December 1 check the $1.22 owed on the October rent, as well as the November rent balance plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15113 - 2017-09-21
County’s December 1 check the $1.22 owed on the October rent, as well as the November rent balance plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15113 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
At trial, Laubert claimed that Mallek owed her $11,958.69. After hearing the testimony of Laubert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21
At trial, Laubert claimed that Mallek owed her $11,958.69. After hearing the testimony of Laubert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that it did not owe deference to the LIRC’s determination of whether Beecher had established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30464 - 2007-10-02
determined that it did not owe deference to the LIRC’s determination of whether Beecher had established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30464 - 2007-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court determined Cochran owed a total of $21,835.76. Thus, he still owed $16,835.76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
. The court determined Cochran owed a total of $21,835.76. Thus, he still owed $16,835.76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
argument, Edward Soroosh’s counsel admitted that Edward Soroosh owed Suzy Mortag $800 based on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34756 - 2014-09-15
argument, Edward Soroosh’s counsel admitted that Edward Soroosh owed Suzy Mortag $800 based on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34756 - 2014-09-15
Hudec Law Offices v. Darlyne Esser
to determine whether or not the disputed legal fees, or any portion thereof, [were], in fact, due and owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6426 - 2005-03-31
to determine whether or not the disputed legal fees, or any portion thereof, [were], in fact, due and owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6426 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Soroosh’s counsel admitted that Edward Soroosh owed Suzy Mortag $800 based on all of this.” ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34756 - 2008-12-01
Soroosh’s counsel admitted that Edward Soroosh owed Suzy Mortag $800 based on all of this.” ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34756 - 2008-12-01