Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 3429 for y's.
Search results 1131 - 1140 of 3429 for y's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and debts. As such, the court stated during its oral ruling: [Y]ou should put in the judgment, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242744 - 2019-06-25
and debts. As such, the court stated during its oral ruling: [Y]ou should put in the judgment, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242744 - 2019-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable judgment. … [Y]ou knew what he was going to do…. What’s aggravating to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65172 - 2011-06-19
reasonable judgment. … [Y]ou knew what he was going to do…. What’s aggravating to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65172 - 2011-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as stated above, Rini testified that there was a “possibilit[y]” that D.O. was responsible for R.C.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246633 - 2019-09-12
, as stated above, Rini testified that there was a “possibilit[y]” that D.O. was responsible for R.C.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246633 - 2019-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a “possible vehicle description” and “what was that description.” The officer responded, “[y]es
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209058 - 2018-03-06
of a “possible vehicle description” and “what was that description.” The officer responded, “[y]es
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209058 - 2018-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
court was correct. [4] What the jury could “possibl[y]” have believed is pure speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
court was correct. [4] What the jury could “possibl[y]” have believed is pure speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rules petition 09-08 comment
. But that is not the law. As the Ellis Court expressly noted, “[B]y allowing the union shop at all, we have already
/supreme/docs/0908commentstatebar2.pdf - 2011-04-11
. But that is not the law. As the Ellis Court expressly noted, “[B]y allowing the union shop at all, we have already
/supreme/docs/0908commentstatebar2.pdf - 2011-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
person of normal sensitivities,” the officer responded “[y]es.” He continued, testifying he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070125 - 2026-01-29
person of normal sensitivities,” the officer responded “[y]es.” He continued, testifying he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070125 - 2026-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
occasion you tortured them. I mean, you twisted their legs [until] they broke. …. [Y]ou had no regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134599 - 2015-02-09
occasion you tortured them. I mean, you twisted their legs [until] they broke. …. [Y]ou had no regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134599 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a continuing pattern that’s spiraled out of control…. [Y]ou can’t stop drinking. And you can’t stop driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
. This is a continuing pattern that’s spiraled out of control…. [Y]ou can’t stop drinking. And you can’t stop driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
Sorry. Okay. [Y]ou have an—you have a—[“]see intentional[”] on here. A JUROR: Yes. THE COURT: Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56196 - 2010-11-01
Sorry. Okay. [Y]ou have an—you have a—[“]see intentional[”] on here. A JUROR: Yes. THE COURT: Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56196 - 2010-11-01