Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11301 - 11310 of 69145 for did.
Search results 11301 - 11310 of 69145 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that the mistake was a clerical error completely within Indymac’s control. The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27
concluded that the mistake was a clerical error completely within Indymac’s control. The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27
State v. Todd A. Lagerstrom
received effective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that he did, and therefore affirm. Lagerstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12604 - 2005-03-31
received effective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that he did, and therefore affirm. Lagerstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
nexus between what he did and the earlier expenditure of $430, and, in connection with the $1800, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46400 - 2014-09-15
nexus between what he did and the earlier expenditure of $430, and, in connection with the $1800, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46400 - 2014-09-15
William Clifford v. James F. Blask
, the six-year arson statute of limitation did not compel a different result. This statute had not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13854 - 2005-03-31
, the six-year arson statute of limitation did not compel a different result. This statute had not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
order did not specify the services to be provided. She contended that the department failed to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53438 - 2014-09-15
order did not specify the services to be provided. She contended that the department failed to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53438 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melissa Garcia v. Duaine C. Stillman
that the issue is waived because Stillman did not object to the court's oversight in failing to place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10686 - 2017-09-20
that the issue is waived because Stillman did not object to the court's oversight in failing to place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10686 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
David J. Geisler v. Marc S. Baldwin
her signature August 13, 2001, although she later testified that she did not actually sign it until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5618 - 2017-09-19
her signature August 13, 2001, although she later testified that she did not actually sign it until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5618 - 2017-09-19
State v. James M. Moran
at issue in this appeal were taken by police from the crime scene, but the original lab analysis did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6222 - 2005-03-31
at issue in this appeal were taken by police from the crime scene, but the original lab analysis did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6222 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas Giegler
), are not in dispute, and need not be repeated here. The trial court concluded that Giegler’s motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2862 - 2005-03-31
), are not in dispute, and need not be repeated here. The trial court concluded that Giegler’s motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2862 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
exculpatory evidence. Because we conclude that the State did not have a duty to preserve the evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28488 - 2007-03-19
exculpatory evidence. Because we conclude that the State did not have a duty to preserve the evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28488 - 2007-03-19