Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11301 - 11310 of 50138 for our.
Search results 11301 - 11310 of 50138 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our review of the trial transcripts persuades us that the State produced sufficient evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143206 - 2017-09-21
. Our review of the trial transcripts persuades us that the State produced sufficient evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143206 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252370 - 2020-01-14
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252370 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an improper legal standard and that there was insufficient evidence to support its findings. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657517 - 2023-05-17
an improper legal standard and that there was insufficient evidence to support its findings. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657517 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
representation of him, and nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
representation of him, and nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
considered the interests of judicial economy ignores our standard of review. On appeal, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20
considered the interests of judicial economy ignores our standard of review. On appeal, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP15-CRNM 2 but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731333 - 2023-11-21
. No. 2022AP15-CRNM 2 but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731333 - 2023-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to reopen a judgment on damages and an order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154986 - 2017-09-21
motion to reopen a judgment on damages and an order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154986 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ben F. Oldakowski
report pursuant to Rule 809.23, Stats. Oldakowski has not responded to the report. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
report pursuant to Rule 809.23, Stats. Oldakowski has not responded to the report. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31