Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11301 - 11310 of 72810 for we.

[PDF] WI App 130
, and multiple other parties. We affirm. 1 BACKGROUND ¶2 Angela Terry is a Milwaukee school bus driver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103001 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 6
that a disputed question of fact precluded entry of judgment in the City’s favor. We granted the City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310211 - 2021-02-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to detective in the Milwaukee Police Department (MPD). We conclude that the Board acted within its authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616559 - 2023-01-31

Timothy A. Pachowitz v. Katherina R. LeDoux
) and (4). ¶3 We uphold the trial court’s rulings denying the appellants’ motion to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5534 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Peter D. Griffin v. Judy P. Smith
While parolees have a right to counsel at the parole revocation hearing, we conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16543 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Eugene Huntington
credibility. Because we determine that the evidence of the child's statements to others falls within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17124 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his motion because DHS lacked authority to transfer him to the custody of DOC. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191356 - 2017-09-21

WI App 90 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP425 Complete Title of ...
that Vollbrecht met the test for obtaining a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We reject the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85353 - 2012-08-28

[PDF] WI APP 90
that Vollbrecht met the test for obtaining a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85353 - 2014-09-15

State v. John T. Trochinski, Jr.
We reject both of Trochinski's arguments and affirm the court of appeals' decision. First, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16421 - 2005-03-31