Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11311 - 11320 of 30164 for de.

[PDF] William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
of discovery. The trial court controls its own calendar. Our de novo review of its decision on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11149 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kerry R.
is a legal issue subject to de novo review by this court. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26315 - 2006-08-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.” Id. However, we “review de novo the ultimate question of ‘whether the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888690 - 2024-12-12

State v. LeRoy J. Dean, Jr.
. We review allegations of due process and double jeopardy violations de novo. See State v. Evans, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15135 - 2005-03-31

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Antjuan E.
a trial court has lost competency to act presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4231 - 2005-03-31

State v. John H. Maclin
authority to order restitution presents us with a question of statutory interpretation that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2005-08-22

COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo.” Id., ¶24. “We examine the challenged jury instruction[] in light of the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120191 - 2014-08-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the motion alleges sufficient material facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Allen, 274 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630159 - 2023-03-14

[PDF] Northern Indiana MFabricators, Inc. v. Seville Flexpack Corporation
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elec. Power Co., 176 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11993 - 2017-09-21

State v. Melvin Beasley
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 132, 473 N.W.2d 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8471 - 2005-03-31