Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11311 - 11320 of 73661 for we.
Search results 11311 - 11320 of 73661 for we.
State v. Carlos Santiago
] We conclude that the trial court's conclusion that Santiago knowingly and intelligently waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7862 - 2005-03-31
] We conclude that the trial court's conclusion that Santiago knowingly and intelligently waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7862 - 2005-03-31
Lewis J. Borsellino v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
and reasonable use doctrines. We disagree with each of his arguments. Because we conclude that the DNR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15495 - 2005-03-31
and reasonable use doctrines. We disagree with each of his arguments. Because we conclude that the DNR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h)(2001-02). 1 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h)(2001-02). 1 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
the conviction. We reject Handley’s arguments and affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
the conviction. We reject Handley’s arguments and affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing.[1] We affirm. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106756 - 2014-01-14
the circuit court order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing.[1] We affirm. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106756 - 2014-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
effect of the errors at trial, a new trial is warranted in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
effect of the errors at trial, a new trial is warranted in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
[PDF]
Law Offices of Alan D. Eisenberg v. Barry Healthcare Services, Inc.
and awarding sanctions. In the alternative, the appellant argues that if we conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2413 - 2017-09-19
and awarding sanctions. In the alternative, the appellant argues that if we conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2413 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roger P. Barber
trial is dismissal, we conclude that he has failed to show that he was prejudiced by the delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11894 - 2005-03-31
trial is dismissal, we conclude that he has failed to show that he was prejudiced by the delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11894 - 2005-03-31
State v. Juan M. Orta
to challenge the search. ¶2 We reverse the trial court’s order. We conclude that an individual who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5155 - 2005-03-31
to challenge the search. ¶2 We reverse the trial court’s order. We conclude that an individual who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered evidence and in the interest of justice. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789210 - 2024-04-16
discovered evidence and in the interest of justice. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789210 - 2024-04-16